<aside> <img src="/icons/view_purple.svg" alt="/icons/view_purple.svg" width="40px" />
</aside>
<aside> <img src="/icons/menorah_purple.svg" alt="/icons/menorah_purple.svg" width="40px" />
This series will examine four distinct ways whereby the Other becomes a decisive philosophical event: as presence, as plurality, as ethical asymmetry, and as structural difference.
Each session focuses on one thinker and one conceptual pathway, presented by a brave member of our community—currently experiencing performance anxiety about presenting to a group of critical Others. But they have no need to worry, because Jedi Master Professor Steven Taubeneck will be on hand to answer the hard hard questions and prevent us from cheating, lying, fabricating, speculating, and bluffing.
This generic placeholder description will be updated once our courageous presenters send in their outlines. For now, mark your calendars, join the discussion, and prepare for a series that explores how twentieth-century thought reconceived relation, responsibility, and alterity at the deepest and most disquieting levels.
</aside>
<aside> <img src="/icons/movie-clapboard-play_purple.svg" alt="/icons/movie-clapboard-play_purple.svg" width="40px" />
<aside> <img src="/icons/subtask_purple.svg" alt="/icons/subtask_purple.svg" width="40px" />
During our last JTO event, someone remarked that —
Hey, all the people we’re covering here are officially phenomenologists, which is a shame since no one in here knows what the hell “phenomenologist,” “phenomenological,” and “phenomenology” actually mean. I bet there are fewer than three people in here who know the Secrets of Phenomenology Proper (PP), and they’re obviously not sharing. If I ran this group, I’d sure as hell …
— it was decided by vote that we ought to do a brief recap episode to explain what is it that Phenomenology Proper is really all about.
That brief recap has expanded organically as we’ve learned that, in order to provide an understanding that penetrates and illuminates the meaning of PP totally, we will have to slog our way through the official set of official PP influencers.
Here they are:
<aside> <img src="/icons/checklist_purple.svg" alt="/icons/checklist_purple.svg" width="40px" />
Aristotle, Augustine, Descartes, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, Herbart, Bolzano, Lotze, Brentano, Stumpf, Mach, Dilthey, Natorp, Frege, Husserl, Scheler, Heidegger, Stein, Ingarden, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, Levinas, Schutz, Gurwitsch, Henry, Derrida, Marion, and Zahavi.
</aside>
But who wants to cover all that? So we’re really only going to cover the unavoidable and core members:
| Role | Figures |
|---|---|
| Pre-PP Sources | Aristotle, Augustine, Descartes, Hume, Kant |
| 19th-Cent Problem Focusers | Brentano, Bolzano, Frege |
| Founder | Husserl |
| 20-Cent Transformers | Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, Levinas, Derrida |
Many new things are being discovered daily through great pain by our presenters, and then delivered to you by the failproof method of nootropically boosted Easy Trance Induction during Meetup time. This is how we do it.
</aside>
<aside> <img src="/icons/movie-clapboard-play_purple.svg" alt="/icons/movie-clapboard-play_purple.svg" width="40px" />
[CURRENT]<aside> <img src="/icons/book_purple.svg" alt="/icons/book_purple.svg" width="40px" />
</aside>
<aside> <img src="/icons/download_purple.svg" alt="/icons/download_purple.svg" width="40px" />
</aside>
<aside> <img src="/icons/download_purple.svg" alt="/icons/download_purple.svg" width="40px" />
</aside>